Document Intelligence

Handwriting, signatures, messy tables, legacy scans. We turn the documents nobody wants to type into structured, auditable data.

OCRExtractionVerification

Handwriting, signatures, messy tables, and scans from a machine that should have been retired a decade ago. These are the documents nobody wants to type, so they sit in a room while somebody decides whose summer intern gets the job.

We've done this at volume in elections, healthcare, and banking. Signature verification on a ballot initiative is a good test of a system, because the output has to survive a legal challenge, not just an accuracy chart.

So extraction is only half of it. The other half is confidence scoring, integrity checks, batch-level review, and an audit trail that shows exactly how a given field got its value.

Battle-tested in elections, healthcare, and banking. Extraction with confidence scores, integrity checks, and human review built in, so the output holds up when someone challenges it.

01

Handwriting and form extraction

Handwritten rows, filled forms, and legacy scans turned into structured fields, with a confidence score attached to each one instead of a single number for the page.

02

Table structure recovery

Tables that span pages, merged cells, and columns that drift. We recover the structure, not just the text, so the output is actually queryable.

03

Signature verification

Match against a reference set with a score, a threshold, and a documented method. Built for the moment someone disputes the result.

04

Integrity and fraud checks

Duplicate detection, sequence checks, and anomaly flags across a batch, because the interesting problems are usually visible at batch level and invisible per page.

05

Sensitive data handling

Scrub identifiers before processing and rehydrate on the other side, so the sensitive fields never sit where they shouldn't.

06

Human review that scales

Reviewers see only what's below threshold, with the crop, the context, and the decision in one screen. That's the difference between reviewing everything and reviewing what matters.

Narrow first. Checkpoint often. Nothing you can't walk away from.

  1. Discovery

    A short sprint with your operators. We map the use case, the objects, and the data you actually have, not the data the diagram says you have.

  2. First build

    We pick the thinnest slice a real person can use on a real day, and ship that. Production-ready on the first release, not a prototype we promise to harden later.

  3. Every two weeks

    A checkpoint and a decision. You see working software, you tell us what is wrong, we adjust. You are never locked into the next phase.

  4. Handover

    Documentation, runbooks, and your engineers in the repo while we build. If we disappear, the thing keeps running.

What you're handed

  • Structured, queryable output with per-field confidence scores

  • Batch-level integrity and anomaly reporting

  • A review interface for everything below threshold

  • An audit trail from the extracted value back to the pixel it came from

  • A documented accuracy method you can defend to an auditor or a court

Shipped, running, and measured.

  • Handwritten Document Processing

    Petition Signature Verification

    Reusable compute modules for handwritten data extraction, signature comparison, and guided human review at scale.

    390K+

    Signatures Processed

    30%

    Cost Reduction

    95%

    Less Manual Review

    100%

    Traceability

Tell us what's breaking. If we're not the right team for it, we'll say so and point you somewhere better.