AI & Agent Workflows

AI grounded in your ontology. Agents governed by your business rules, with human-in-the-loop where it matters.

AgentsGroundingHITL

We don't do prototype theater. A chatbot that answers questions about a PDF is a demo. An agent that reconciles an invoice, flags the three that don't match, and routes them to the person who can fix it is a system.

The difference is grounding. Our agents read from your ontology, so they operate on the same objects and the same permissions your people do. They take actions from your action catalog, which means every write is validated and logged before it commits.

Where the stakes are high, a person stays in the loop. Not as a rubber stamp, as a real review station with the context to make the call in a few seconds. That's the part most AI projects skip, and it's usually why they never make it to production.

We don't do prototype theater. Agents ship into production workflows with audit trails, quality gates, and a human validation station where the stakes call for one.

01

Grounded agents

Agents that read your objects, not a scraped copy of them. Same data, same permissions, same definitions your operators use, so the answer holds up when someone checks it.

02

Governed actions

An agent proposes a write. Your rules validate it. The system logs who or what asked, what changed, and why. Nothing commits outside the action catalog.

03

Human in the loop

A review station where a person sees the proposal, the evidence, and the confidence, then approves or corrects in a couple of seconds. The corrections feed back into quality.

04

Quality gates and evals

Confidence thresholds, sampling, and a conductor that routes low-confidence work to review instead of pushing it through. You get a measured accuracy number, not a vibe.

05

Retrieval that respects permissions

Context filtering so an agent never surfaces a row the person asking isn't cleared to see. Access control at retrieval time, not bolted on after.

06

Audit trail

Every prompt, every source, every action, kept. When someone asks why the system did what it did nine months ago, there's an answer.

Narrow first. Checkpoint often. Nothing you can't walk away from.

  1. Discovery

    A short sprint with your operators. We map the use case, the objects, and the data you actually have, not the data the diagram says you have.

  2. First build

    We pick the thinnest slice a real person can use on a real day, and ship that. Production-ready on the first release, not a prototype we promise to harden later.

  3. Every two weeks

    A checkpoint and a decision. You see working software, you tell us what is wrong, we adjust. You are never locked into the next phase.

  4. Handover

    Documentation, runbooks, and your engineers in the repo while we build. If we disappear, the thing keeps running.

What you're handed

  • Agents running inside a real workflow, not a sandbox

  • A human validation station wired into the steps that need one

  • Confidence thresholds and quality gates with a measured baseline

  • Full audit trail on prompts, sources, and actions

  • Escalation paths for what the agent should refuse to decide

Shipped, running, and measured.

  • Handwritten Document Processing

    Petition Signature Verification

    Reusable compute modules for handwritten data extraction, signature comparison, and guided human review at scale.

    390K+

    Signatures Processed

    30%

    Cost Reduction

    95%

    Less Manual Review

    100%

    Traceability

  • Mass Event Security Planning

    Counter-UAS Simulation

    3D simulation for counter-UAS response planning, enabling security teams to rehearse and refine strategies on Palantir.

    50+

    Zones Per Venue

    <5 min

    Scenario Launch

    100K+

    Event Capacity

    150+

    Response Paths

Tell us what's breaking. If we're not the right team for it, we'll say so and point you somewhere better.